Which statement best describes the mental state required for theft regarding permanent deprivation?

Only if they intend to permanently deprive

The key idea is the mental element: theft requires an intention to permanently deprive the owner of their property. If someone takes something with the aim of keeping it or disposing of it as their own, that satisfies the requirement. But if the person intends only to borrow it or return it, there’s no permanent deprivation, so it isn’t theft. Likewise, if the owner consents to taking the item, there’s no deprivation to begin with. The value of the item doesn’t matter—even a low-value item can be theft if there’s an intention to permanently deprive.

Only if they intend to borrow temporarily

Only if the owner consents at the time

Only if the item has a high monetary value

Want more questions?

All options are one-time payments.

$12.50

30 day premium pass

All the basics to get you started

  • Ad-free experience
  • View your previous attempt history
  • Mobile app access
  • In-depth explanations
  • 30 day premium pass access
$30.00 $87.50 usd

6 month DELUXE pass (most popular)

Everything with the 30 day premium pass FOR 6 MONTHS! & the ultimate digital PDF study guide (BONUS)

  • Everything included in the premium pass
  • $87.50 usd value for $30.00! You save $57.50!
  • + Access to the ultimate digital PDF study guide
  • + 6 months of premium pass access
  • + Priority support
$12.50 $18.99

Ultimate digital PDF study guide

For those that prefer a more traditional form of learning

  • Available for instant download
  • Available offline
  • Hundreds of practice multiple choice questions
  • Comprehensive content
  • Detailed explanations
Image Description
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy